Spatial Aggregation and Soil Process Modelling
Gerard Heuvelink
Environmental Sciences, University of Amsterdam
Nieuwe Prinsengracht 130 NL-1018 VZ Amsterdam
e-mail: gh@fgb.frw.uva.nl
Nonlinear soil process models that are defined and calibrated at the point support cannot at the same time be
valid at the block support. This means that in the usual situation where model input is available at point support
and where model output is required at block support, spatial aggregation should take place after the model is
run. Although block-kriging does both in one pass, it is sensible to separate spatial aggregation from spatial
interpolation. Contrary to aggregation, interpolation should better take place before the model is run, because in that
case more use can be made of the spatial correlation characteristics of individual inputs. When a model is run
with interpolated inputs it is important not to ignore the interpolation error. Substituting conditional
expectations instead of probability distributions into a nonlinear model leads to bias, essentially for the same reason
that aggregating inputs prior to running a model yields a different result than aggregating the output after the model
is run. Running a model with inputs that are probability distributions will usually call for a Monte Carlo
simulation approach. This brings with it a substantial increase of numerical load, but apart from eliminating bias, an
additional important advantage is that the uncertainty in the model output becomes known. Many models used in
soil science suffer not only from input error but also from model error. Model error is both support-dependent
and case-dependent. The latter implies that model error can only realistically be assessed through validation. Here
we face again a change of support problem, because point validation measurements must be aggregated to the
block support. Use of meta-models to aggregate validation data must be discouraged because hidden similarities
in behaviour between the meta-model and the model to be validated will yield too optimistic validation results.
Back to the Abstracts Page
|